Skip to main content

State v. Schwartz

Citations

  • 583 S.E.2d 573
  • 261 Ga. App. 742
  • 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that whether exigent circumstances exist is an issue for the trial court to decide, and that “the State points to no evidence that the deputies believed an emergency situation actually existed”
  • upholding trial court’s finding that officer could not peer through window of third party’s home while serving arrest warrant on nonresident
  • “police may walk to the door of a residence on the same route as would any guest, deliveryman, postal employee, or other caller”
  • trial court properly suppressed evidence illegally seen by police

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruffin, Smith, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.