Celestin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prior trafficking-in-cocaine conviction was sufficiently similar to current trafficking-in-cocaine charge and, thus, was admissible to show defendant’s bent of mind
• holding that prior trafficking-in-cocaine conviction was sufficiently similar to current trafficking-in-cocaine charge and, thus, was admissible to show defendant’s bent of mind

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).