Skip to main content

State v. David

Citations

  • 501 S.E.2d 494
  • 269 Ga. 533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “an appellate court must adopt the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and not supported by any evidence”
  • officer’s warrantless entry justified by likelihood that contraband would be destroyed, where officer saw occupant attempt to conceal contraband
  • grant of motion to suppress was error in light of uncontradicted evidence that officer saw contraband from vantage point outside apartment
  • \an appellate court must adopt the trial court's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and not supported by any evidence\
  • officer’s warrantless entry justified by likelihood that evidence would be destroyed, where officer saw occupant attempt to conceal the same in response to police presence at the door
  • “[T]he plain view doctrine authorizes seizure of illegal or evidentiary items visible to a police officer only if the officer’s access to the object itself has some prior Fourth Amendment justification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.