Skip to main content
· 2/21/2005

Kirsche v. State

Citations

  • 611 S.E.2d 64
  • 271 Ga. App. 729
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 633
  • 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing denial of motion to suppress because officers were not authorized to enter home’s curtilage
  • generally, plain view doctrine applies regardless of whether the officer expected or suspected that he would discover object seized
  • officers investigating domestic complaint could not enter back yard for routine security reasons without consent or exigent circumstances and without first knocking on front door
  • officers wrongfully entered back yard where defendant had already responded to knock at front door
  • even if officers have probable cause to investigate a crime, without a warrant, exigent circumstances, or proper consent, they may not enter a home or its curtilage
  • even if officers have probable cause to investigate a crime, without a warrant, exigent circumstances, or proper consent, they may not enter a home or its curtilage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Bernes, Ruffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.