State v. Soppe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a defendant consenting to a deferred judgment ... was assured that upon completion of probation he or she would have no ‘record’ ”
• applying Iowa Code section 4.13(1) to hold that statutory amendment enhancing punishment “could not take [away a] right” a defendant acquired earlier
• interpreting Iowa Code section 321.-281(2)(c) (1985), now found at section 321J.2(3)
• ex post facto clause is violated when a statute “makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission”
• ex post facto clause is violated when a statute “makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).