State v. Axline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming because although the evidence could have supported a different conclusion than that reached by the district court, there was substantial evidence to support the conclusion actually reached
• stating that “[c]onsiderable deference should be given to a trial court’s factual findings” under Iowa Code § 321J.7, and that a person who is conscious can nevertheless be “in a condition rendering him incapable of giving or refusing consent”
• affirming because although the evidence could have supported a different conclusion than that reached by the district court, there was substantial evidence to support the conclusion actually reached
• error to charge and sentence for both vehicular homicide and OWI

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).