Skip to main content

Dennis O. v. Stephanie O.

Citations

  • 393 P.3d 401
  • 2017 WL 1034529
  • 2017 Alas. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding due process does not require appointing counsel for parent when other parent retained private counsel
  • holding due process rights were not violated by absence of representation when parent “had the opportunity to appear at the hearing, make his case, and testify if he desired”
  • noting that “the right to the care and custody of one’s own child is a fundamental right recognized by both the federal and state constitutions” (quoting J.M.R. v. S.T.R., 15 P.3d 253, 257 (Alaska 2001))
  • declining to extend right to appointed counsel to indigent parent when other parent represented by private counsel
  • declining to constitutionally mandate “court-appointed counsel for every indigent parent in a child custody proceeding when the opposing parent is represented by private counsel”
  • denying court-appointed counsel to parent in custody dispute when other parent was represented by private counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stowers, Fabe, Winfree, Maassen, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.