Harlen Associates v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of Mineola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding board action not unconstitutionally arbitrary “if the opposition is based on legitimate state interests such as, inter alia, traffic, safety, crime, community pride, or noise”
• “Although all inferences must be drawn in favor of the nonmoving party, mere speculation and conjecture is insufficient to preclude the granting of the motion.”
• “[M]ere speculation and conjecture is insufficient to preclude the granting of the [summary judgment] motion.”
• “conclusory statements, conjecture, or speculation by the party resisting the motion will not defeat summary judgment”
• “The Equal Protection Clause requires that the government treat all similarly situated people alike.”
• “The Equal Protection Clause requires that the government treat all similarly situated people alike.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).