Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1/4/2005

State v. Scacchetti

Citations

690 N.W.2d 393
2005 Minn. App. LEXIS 1
2005 WL 14673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that Crawford would require exclusion of statements only if surrounding circumstances would have led a three-year-old declarant to believe her disclosures would be available for use at trial
reporting appellant's failure to show that circumstances of interrogation \led the three-year-old to reasonably believe her disclosures would be available for use at a later trial\
reporting appellant’s failure to show that circumstances of interrogation “led the three-year-old to reasonably believe her disclosures would be available for use at a later trial”
similarly reciting that appellant “must show, under Crawford,” that declarant “reasonably believe[d] her disclosures would be available for use at a later trial, or that the circumstances would lead a reasonable child of her age to have that expectation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schumacher, Klaphaee, Stoneburner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.