State v. Scacchetti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Crawford would require exclusion of statements only if surrounding circumstances would have led a three-year-old declarant to believe her disclosures would be available for use at trial
• reporting appellant's failure to show that circumstances of interrogation \led the three-year-old to reasonably believe her disclosures would be available for use at a later trial\
• reporting appellant’s failure to show that circumstances of interrogation “led the three-year-old to reasonably believe her disclosures would be available for use at a later trial”
• similarly reciting that appellant “must show, under Crawford,” that declarant “reasonably believe[d] her disclosures would be available for use at a later trial, or that the circumstances would lead a reasonable child of her age to have that expectation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).