New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1/14/1987
State v. Santana
Citations
- 521 A.2d 346
- 215 N.J. Super. 63
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a suspect can waive the right to be present during a search
- finding \the scope of a consent search is limited by the terms of its authorization\
- where this court noted that because defendant had permission from the owner of the car to drive the vehicle, he could also consent to a search of the vehicle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Dreier and Stern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SuazoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-27· cited 76×
- State v. MaristanySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-27· cited 70×
- State v. CurrySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-10-15· cited 31×
- State v. LeeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-01-17· cited 18×
- State v. PowellNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-11-06· cited 15×
- State v. BinnsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-02-18· cited 15×
- State v. FarmerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-01-28· cited 9×
- State v. HamptonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-07-13· cited 8×
- State v. MorantNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-05-09· cited 8×
- State v. KaltnerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-06-29· cited 8×
- State in Interest of CSNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-12-18· cited 5×
- State v. BoudNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-04-18· cited 2×
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. TEOSHIE WILLIAMS (14-09-0992, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-08-29
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 793×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-10-08· cited 338×
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-10-21· cited 275×
- Tompkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-01-29· cited 177×
- United States v. Anthony J. DichiarinteSeventh Circuit· 1971-06-04· cited 170×
- People v. CosmeNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-11-20· cited 167×
- State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-07-24· cited 143×
- United States v. Harriet Ann Impink, United States of America v. Richard D. BolanosNinth Circuit· 1984-03-19· cited 135×
- Silva v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-03-24· cited 63×
- State v. DouglasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-09-13· cited 58×
- Irene Lucero v. Thomas W. DonovanNinth Circuit· 1966-01-14· cited 48×
- United States v. Manuel Mendoza Torres, Max Candido Griego, Sarah Godoy and Susan Smith SpiegelTenth Circuit· 1981-11-05· cited 45×
- State v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-05-31· cited 35×
- State v. WhittingtonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-06-01· cited 29×
- United States v. BilyE.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-12-12· cited 25×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-09-07· cited 23×
- State v. MurrayNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-06-29· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.