Supreme Court of New Jersey· 10/15/1987
State v. Curry
Citations
- 532 A.2d 721
- 109 N.J. 1
- 1987 N.J. LEXIS 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the nexus between the property seized and individual defendants may become so attenuated as to eliminate standing
- noting \the nexus between the [seized] property and the individual defendants [may] become[] so attenuated as to eliminate standing\
- New Jersey courts generally take a liberal view of standing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Hern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. EversSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-02-13· cited 169×
- State v. MollicaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-03-16· cited 144×
- State v. GrissomSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-11-10· cited 133×
- Verni Ex Rel. Burstein v. STEVENS, INC.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-08-03· cited 72×
- Diamond Shamrock Chemicals v. AetnaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-06-04· cited 61×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1995-09-08· cited 45×
- Glynwed, Inc. v. Plastimatic, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1994-11-09· cited 45×
- State v. MinterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-08-04· cited 43×
- State v. TaccettaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-05-23· cited 40×
- Bussell v. DeWalt Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-10-09· cited 33×
- Bell v. Merchants & Businessmen's Mut.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-06-14· cited 23×
- State v. BrunsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-05-09· cited 21×
- State v. De La PazNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-02-16· cited 18×
- State v. ChaneyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-02-16· cited 13×
- State v. FordNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-01-03· cited 11×
- Nicole Prager v. Joyce Honda, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-08-22· cited 11×
- State v. AriasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-06-16· cited 10×
- State v. DeLuzioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-06-08· cited 8×
- State v. CagnoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-09-10· cited 6×
- State v. ArthurNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-01-31· cited 4×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,569×
- Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 854×
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-07· cited 387×
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-10-21· cited 275×
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-06-16· cited 187×
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-07-10· cited 173×
- State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-07-24· cited 143×
- The People v. SaikenIllinois Supreme Court· 1971-10-04· cited 94×
- Pooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-06· cited 76×
- Burge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-07-09· cited 56×
- Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings of GuarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-10-15· cited 47×
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-07-09· cited 38×
- State v. WadeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1965-10-01· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.