Skip to main content

State v. Sands

Citations

  • 700 P.2d 1369
  • 145 Ariz. 269
  • 1985 Ariz. App. LEXIS 518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • improper admission of privileged testimony was harmless error when the evidence was \not critical\ to the state's case
  • “vague allegations of ‘dictatorial means’ tainting the deliberations” held not to be misconduct
  • suspect in a siege setting is not in custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsall, Howard, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.