USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when a plaintiff does not obtain the benefit 19 of its bargain, she is “free to pursue a claim for unjust enrichment”
• noting that plaintiffs who fail to obtain the benefit of their 19 bargain are “free to pursue a claim for unjust enrichment”
• stating that when a plaintiff does not obtain the benefit of its bargain, she is 15 “free to pursue a claim for unjust enrichment”
• stating that when a plaintiff does not obtain the 24 benefit of its bargain, she is “free to pursue a claim for unjust enrichment”
• comparing USLife, where the defendant 13 performed his contractual obligation, to Automotive Tire Services, Inc. v. First Nat’l Bank 14 of Arizona, 102 Ariz. 512, 433 P.2d 804 (1967
• only “a contract specificallygovermng the rights and obligations of each party precludes recovery for unjust enrichment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).