Quigley v. City Court of the City of Tucson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appropriate remedy for state to review orders of dismissal with prejudice was by special action where statutory provision then in effect did not give the state a right of appeal from such orders
• interpreting Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 16.5(d) concerning dismissal of criminal prosecutions
• abuse of discretion “is discretion manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons”
• “An ‘abuse of discretion’ is discretion manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.”
• an abuse of discretion occurs when the ruling is “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.”
• a difference in judicial opinion is not synonymous with an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).