State v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding trial court’s decision to allow in-court identification after determining that the photograph array was not impermissibly suggestive
• rejecting defendant’s argument that he is “clearly older” than others in a nine photograph array and that he is the only smiling subject; noting that all were photographs of white males about the same age as defendant; holding that the array was not impermissibly suggestive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Salgado
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-01-26· cited 177×
• State v. Clark
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-03-09· cited 106×
• Terry Clark v. Robert J. Tansy, Warden Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-12-30· cited 91×
• State v. McGruder
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-05-05· cited 65×
• State v. Clark
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-07-08· cited 62×
• State v. Stampley
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 51×
• McGlauflin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-08-06· cited 13×
• State v. Cooper
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-10-27· cited 12×
• State v. Antonio M.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2022-03-17· cited 5×
• State v. Jones
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-02-16· cited 4×