Skip to main content
· 1/29/2003

State v. Sagdal

Citations

  • 61 P.3d 975
  • 186 Or. App. 134
  • 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the defendant was convicted on basis of accomplice testimony and corroborative evidence that the state conceded failed to demonstrate that the defendant was connected with commission of the crime, the trial court erred in denying motion for judgment of acquittal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Linder, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.