McIntire v. Forbes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, for a claim to be ripe, “ ‘[t]he controversy must involve present facts as opposed to a dispute which is based on future events of a hypothetical issue’ ”
• holding that, for a claim to be ripe, “[t]he controversy must involve present facts as opposed to a dispute which is based on future events of a hypothetical issue”
• concluding that, although operation of the legislation challenged in that case was “contingent” on funding that “may or may not be committed[,]” “[t]hat uncertainty ** * does not prevent ripeness for decision”
• holding that, for a claim to be ripe, “[t]he controversy must involve present facts as opposed to a dispute which is based on future events of a hypothetical issue” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that, for a claim to be ripe, \[t]he controversy must involve present facts as opposed to a dispute which is based on future events of a hypothetical issue\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• concluding that, although operation of the legislation challenged in that case was “contingent” on funding that “may or may not be committed[,]” “[t]hat uncertainty * * * does not prevent ripeness for decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).