State v. Safford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Neil not to be retroactively applied to cases where appellate process was completed when Neil became effective
• declined to retroactively apply State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984), which changed the long-standing rule in Florida that a party could never be required to explain the reasons for exercising preemptory challenges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-06· cited 88×
• State v. Glenn
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-02-15· cited 60×
• Mitchell v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-04-12· cited 56×
• Bunkley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-27· cited 17×
• Bunkley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-11-21· cited 15×
• Love v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-02-15· cited 15×
• Webber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-29· cited 7×
• Wright v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-05-29· cited 2×
• State v. Lenard
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-06-05
• Nicholson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-20
• Wooten v. Dugger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Neil
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-27· cited 507×
• Safford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-22· cited 6×
• Florida Bar v. Whitlock
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-03-20· cited 2×