State v. Rutherford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that suppression is proper in cases involving a violation of a statute -3- implementing or expanding a constitutional right
• suppressing medical records obtained by state attorney in violation of defendant’s right of privacy
• \A compelling state interest in this type of case is established by showing that the police have a reasonable founded suspicion that protected materials contain information relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation.\
• “The [exclusionary] rule is properly applied in cases where evidence is obtained through a constitutional violation [or] a violation of a statute implementing or expanding on a constitutional right . . . .” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 46×
• State v. Sun
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-01· cited 17×
• State v. Rivers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-13· cited 13×
• Cameron v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-18· cited 10×
• Sneed v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-16· cited 8×
• State v. Manney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-15· cited 7×
• Cerroni v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-14· cited 7×
• Klossett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-19· cited 6×
• State v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-11· cited 6×
• State v. Barker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-17· cited 6×
• State v. Viatical Services, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-04· cited 4×
• Farrall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 4×
• State v. Fahner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-19· cited 4×
• Sneed v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 3×
• Sneed v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-06· cited 3×
• Swope v. Krischer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-18· cited 1×
• State v. Kutik
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-04· cited 1×
• State of Florida v. Strickling
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-13· cited 1×
• Devers-Lopez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-13· cited 1×
• Rogers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-03· cited 1×

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Leon
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Michigan v. Tucker
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
• People v. Cahan
  California Supreme Court· 1955-04-27· cited 640×
• Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-10· cited 147×
• In re T.W.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-10-05· cited 142×
• Rasmussen v. South Florida Blood Service
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-01-05· cited 122×
• Acosta v. Richter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-01-18· cited 98×
• Robertson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-16· cited 61×
• Shaktman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-10-12· cited 48×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-13· cited 38×
• OFFICE OF STATE ATTY. v. Parrotino
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-12-02· cited 30×
• Hunter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-20· cited 27×
• State v. Slaney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-22· cited 18×
• D.F. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-01· cited 11×
• Gulley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-11· cited 10×
• Ussery v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-18· cited 10×
• Hansen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-03-10· cited 10×
• State v. Wenger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-26· cited 8×
• Slim-Fast Foods Co. v. Brockmeyer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-24· cited 3×