Farrall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, to obtain a search warrant, the state must show probable cause that the records are relevant to the commission of a crime
• warrant requires higher threshold of proof and as result, no notice or hearing required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Search Warrant for Medical Records of C.T.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-05-06· cited 12×
• McAlevy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-20· cited 8×
• State v. LEGRAND
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-07· cited 5×
• In Re Ct
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-05-06· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dean v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-31· cited 50×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 46×
• State v. Rutherford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-04· cited 29×
• Limbaugh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 13×
• State v. Rivers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-13· cited 13×
• State v. Farrall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06· cited 2×