People v. Wells
Citations
- 100 Cal. 459
- 34 P. 1078
- 1893 Cal. LEXIS 819
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law—Trial—Misconduct of Prosecuting Attorney—Improper Questions to Prejudice Jury—Where the prosecuting attorney in a criminal action asks a defendant questions which he knows to be wholly inadmissible and wrong, without the expectation of answers, the clear purpose of which is to prejudice the jury against the defendant in a vital matter by the mere asking of the question, a judgment against the defendant will be reversed, although objections to the questions were sustained, unless it appears that the questions could not have influenced the verdict.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- commenting on repeated questions asked of the defendant as a witness and concerning prior misconduct of various sorts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co.Second Circuit· 1946-05-02· cited 191×
- People v. PittsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-09-05· cited 169×
- People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-09-05· cited 87×
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-11-07· cited 69×
- People v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1907-08-14· cited 57×
- State v. IrwinIdaho Supreme Court· 1903-02-04· cited 57×
- People v. AngelopoulusCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-01-26· cited 42×
- Parmagini v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1930-07-28· cited 42×
- People v. PodwysCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-04-10· cited 40×
- People v. GordanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-08-17· cited 39×
- James v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1899-06-05· cited 37×
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-12-31· cited 36×
- State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1924-04-04· cited 36×
- Gill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1959-06-01· cited 35×
- People v. CrandallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1899-06-17· cited 33×
- Dastagir v. DastagirCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-03-19· cited 31×
- State v. ColoffMontana Supreme Court· 1951-04-11· cited 27×
- State v. SilversSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-01-06· cited 27×
- People v. WillmurthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-01-10· cited 26×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. ChuckCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-03-05· cited 55×
- People v. MullingsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-02-14· cited 46×
- People v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-07-08· cited 43×
- People v. Ah LenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-12-12· cited 32×
- People v. CahoonMichigan Supreme Court· 1891-11-20· cited 28×
- People v. BowersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-06-01· cited 22×
- Leahy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1891-03-17· cited 20×
- State v. TrottMissouri Court of Appeals· 1889-04-16· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.