Skip to main content

People v. Wells

Citations

  • 100 Cal. 459
  • 34 P. 1078
  • 1893 Cal. LEXIS 819

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law—Trial—Misconduct of Prosecuting Attorney—Improper Questions to Prejudice Jury—Where the prosecuting attorney in a criminal action asks a defendant questions which he knows to be wholly inadmissible and wrong, without the expectation of answers, the clear purpose of which is to prejudice the jury against the defendant in a vital matter by the mere asking of the question, a judgment against the defendant will be reversed, although objections to the questions were sustained, unless it appears that the questions could not have influenced the verdict.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting on repeated questions asked of the defendant as a witness and concerning prior misconduct of various sorts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.