Skip to main content

State v. Grant

Citations

  • 575 P.2d 210
  • 89 Wash. 2d 678
  • 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the savings clause did not apply since the legislature had included language evidencing its intent that former RCW 70.96A.010 (1972) be applied retroactively to pending cases
  • holding that former obstruction statute, the language of which is almost identical to that of the current statute, \focuses on conduct other than speech\
  • approving citation charging \obstructing a public officer in the performance of his duty\
  • approving citation charging \obstructing a public officer in the performance of his duty\
  • information must apprise defendants with reasonable certainty of the nature of the accusation against them so they may prepare an adequate defense
  • information must apprise defendants with reasonable certainty of the nature of the accusation against them so they may prepare an adequate defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dolliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.