In Re Hegney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where codefendant’s statements did not refer to Hegney by name or otherwise, did not contain blanks or obvious deletions, and were accompanied by a limiting instruction, codefendant was not a witness against Hegney and the protections of the confrontation clause were not at issue
• where codefendant's statements did not refer to Hegney by name or otherwise, did not contain blanks or obvious deletions, and were accompanied by a limiting instruction, codefendant was not a witness against Hegney and the protections of the confrontation clause were not at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).