Skip to main content

State v. Chapin

Citations

  • 67 Ohio St. 2d 437
  • 424 N.E.2d 317
  • 21 Ohio Op. 3d 273
  • 1981 Ohio LEXIS 600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed “the long-standing rule that a reviewing court will uphold the trial court’s decision to exclude evidence if the record does not contain a proffer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Ninth, Sweeney, Victor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.