Skip to main content
· 11/8/1975

In Re Inquiry Relating to Rome

Citations

  • 542 P.2d 676
  • 218 Kan. 198
  • 1975 Kan. LEXIS 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[although ajudge has the right of free speech,” any restrictions placed by the code of professional responsibility are acceptable limits and prevent the First Amendment from “exempt[ing] a judge from discipline for proven judicial misconduct.”
  • refusing to apply the prior term rule to judge because of his role in the judicial system
  • “It is well settled, of course, that a judge is not subject to discipline for exercising his discretion in performing a judicial act, even if his decision be erroneous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.