Hawaii Supreme Court· 9/21/2007

State v. Sunderland

Citations

168 P.3d 526
115 Haw. 396
2007 Haw. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that Petitioner made an argument at trial that \differ[ed] from the argument [he sought] to assert on appeal\ and, therefore, the court would not address it (citing HRS § 641-2 (Supp.2004
concluding that Petitioner made an argument at trial that “differed] from the argument [he sought] to assert on appeal” and, therefore, the court would not address it (citing HRS § 641-2 (Supp.2004
referring to Employment Div., Dep't of Human Res, of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nakayama, Duffy, Moon, Levinson, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Sunderland

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.