Skip to main content
· 4/7/2006

Burgess v. Shampooch Pet Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 35 Kan. App. 2d 458
  • 131 P.3d 1248
  • 2006 Kan. App. LEXIS 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The district court properly found that a dog is personal property in determining the measure of damages.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buser, Malone, Caplinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.