Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/16/1991
State v. Robinson
Citations
- 412 S.E.2d 411
- 306 S.C. 399
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that consent to a search procured during an unlawful stop is invalid unless such consent is voluntary and there are attenuating circumstances that establish that the consent is not an exploitation of the unlawful stop
- holding consent to search procured during unlawful stop invalid unless State proves consent is voluntary and that sufficient attenuating circumstances remove taint of unlawful stop so that search is not an exploitation of unlawful stop
- suppressing drug evidence as the fruit of an unlawful stop because no attenuating circumstances removed the taint of the illegality from the consent to search
- suppressing drug evidence as the fruit of an unlawful stop because no attenuating circumstances removed the taint of the illegality from the consent to search
- “To justify a brief stop [or] detention, the police officer must have a reasonable suspicion that the person has been involved in criminal activity.”
- “To justify a brief stop [or] detention, the police officer must have a reasonable suspicion that the person has been involved in criminal activity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Gregory, Harwell, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-01-19· cited 114×
- McCourt by and Through McCourt v. AbernathySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-05-01· cited 70×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-10-05· cited 64×
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-12-02· cited 63×
- State v. PichardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-31· cited 61×
- State v. BlassingameCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 47×
- Fleming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-14· cited 40×
- Ransom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 39×
- State v. ProvetSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-08-14· cited 37×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-09-09· cited 34×
- State v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-12· cited 25×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-01-05· cited 22×
- State v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-04-15· cited 17×
- State v. LesleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-09· cited 15×
- State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-11-13· cited 13×
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-18· cited 12×
- State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 11×
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-18· cited 11×
- State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 8×
- State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-04-20· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-06· cited 90×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-09-06· cited 56×
- State v. KimbrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-23· cited 42×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-14· cited 42×
- State v. PatrickSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-06-09· cited 42×
- State v. CulbreathSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-02· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.