· 5/1/1995
McCourt by and Through McCourt v. Abernathy
Citations
- 457 S.E.2d 603
- 318 S.C. 301
- 1995 S.C. LEXIS 74
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that when the jury’s verdict is inadequate or excessive, the trial judge has the discretionary power to grant a new trial nisi
- trial judge alone has power to grant new trial nisi when he finds amount of verdict to be merely inadequate or excessive
- judge did not err in refusing to give a charge having a tendency to confuse the jury
- the amount of damages, actual or punitive, is largely within the discretion of the jury, as reviewed by the trial judge, and review by this Court is limited
- judge did not err in refusing to give a charge having a tendency to confuse the jury
- “The trial judge is required to charge only the current and correct law of South Carolina.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Finney, Shaw, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.