Skip to main content
· 5/1/1995

McCourt by and Through McCourt v. Abernathy

Citations

  • 457 S.E.2d 603
  • 318 S.C. 301
  • 1995 S.C. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that when the jury’s verdict is inadequate or excessive, the trial judge has the discretionary power to grant a new trial nisi
  • trial judge alone has power to grant new trial nisi when he finds amount of verdict to be merely inadequate or excessive
  • judge did not err in refusing to give a charge having a tendency to confuse the jury
  • the amount of damages, actual or punitive, is largely within the discretion of the jury, as reviewed by the trial judge, and review by this Court is limited
  • judge did not err in refusing to give a charge having a tendency to confuse the jury
  • “The trial judge is required to charge only the current and correct law of South Carolina.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Finney, Shaw, Toal, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.