Skip to main content

State v. Roberts

Citations

  • 465 S.W.3d 899
  • 2015 Mo. LEXIS 147
  • 2015 WL 4627393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that assault and witness tampering charges were connected, in part, because acts leading to witness tampering charges would not have occurred in absence of assault
  • finding different mens rea requirements are differential elements of which the State bears the burden of proof when the remaining elements of the offenses remain the same
  • “[l]f Mr. Randle ‘knowingly’ inflicted physical injury, he necessarily engaged in conduct sufficient to establish .that he ‘recklessly’ inflicted physical injury,”
  • “[P]roof that Mr. Roberts committed second-degree domestic assault by ‘knowingly’ causing physical injury to A.A. necessarily means there was also a basis in the evidence for the jury to convict Mr. Roberts of third-degree domestic assault by ‘recklessly’ injuring A.A.”
  • handed down with Randle and employing the same analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teitelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.