Skip to main content

State v. Carter

Citations

  • 523 S.W.3d 590
  • 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 695
  • 2017 WL 2938537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim, included in an untimely motion for new trial, was not preserved for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardwick, Martin, Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.