Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/11/2019
State v. Roberts
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 49
Syllabus
The appellant's statutory maximum sentence for improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation is not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Contrary to the appellant's argument, the record does not demonstrate that the trial court failed to satisfy its obligation to consider the \seriousness\ and \recidivism\ factors in R.C. 2929.12. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DuffyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-01· cited 4×
- State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-04· cited 4×
- State v. CrossleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-19· cited 3×
- State v. BlakleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-27· cited 1×
- State v. AliOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-09
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-16
- State v. ScraggOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-04
- State v. FrancisOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.