Skip to main content

State v. Crossley

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2938

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences and one maximum sentence on appellant. The trial court made the appropriate statutory findings, and the sentences were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.