Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/19/2019
State v. Crossley
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2938
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences and one maximum sentence on appellant. The trial court made the appropriate statutory findings, and the sentences were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 113×
- State v. PawlakOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
- State v. WithrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 72×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 36×
- State v. NelsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-07· cited 30×
- State v. BrandonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-22· cited 8×
- State v. WhittOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 8×
- State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-11· cited 8×
- State v. CarltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-05· cited 7×
- State v. HandOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-25· cited 5×
- State v. Guerrero-SanchezOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-13· cited 5×
- State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-05· cited 4×
- State v. GilbreathOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.