State v. Francis
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1472
Syllabus
Consecutive maximum sentence involuntary manslaughter. Judgment affirmed. The trial court made the statutorily required findings for the imposition of consecutive sentences. We are unable to say that the record clearly and convincingly does not support the court's findings. The trial court was not required to make any findings in imposing maximum sentences. The trial court considered the factors set forth in R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 and sentenced the defendant within the statutory range. We do not find that the defendant's maximum sentences were clearly and convincingly unsupported by the evidence.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. VenesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-09· cited 321×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
- State v. NiaOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-12· cited 71×
- State v. ReindlOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-29· cited 26×
- State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-11· cited 8×
- State v. TrujilloOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.