Skip to main content

State v. Roberts

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4885

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in imposing maximum sentences for Appellant's convictions of improperly discharging a firearm at or into a habitation and having weapons under disability. The record indicates that the trial court properly considered relevant factors under R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12. Furthermore, the record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support the court's decision to impose maximum sentences. The trial court also did not err in imposing the sentences in this case consecutive to Appellant's sentence for a prior conviction of having weapons under disability. The court made the proper findings for imposing consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring.)

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.