Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/4/2019
State v. Serna
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4102
Syllabus
Appellant's maximum consecutive sentence was not contrary to law, and the trial court had no obligation to consider appellant's age (17 at the time of the offenses) as a mitigating factor. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. BautistaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-19· cited 16×
- State v. StarlingOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-19· cited 16×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-17· cited 14×
- State v. BynumOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-05· cited 5×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-21· cited 4×
- State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.