State v. Jenkins
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2249
Syllabus
Defendant-appellant's eight-year prison sentence was not contrary to law, and we cannot conclude by clear and convincing evidence that the record did not support the sentence. Defendant-appellant's failure to assert a speedy trial violation in the trial court prevents consideration of this issue on appeal. Finally, Defendant-appellant cannot establish ineffective assistance of counsel on this record. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 176×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. RodefferOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-27· cited 137×
- State v. BowserOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-03-12· cited 106×
- State v. DankworthOhio Court of Appeals· 2007-05-25· cited 44×
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-26· cited 38×
- State v. BautistaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-19· cited 16×
- State v. RozellOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-04· cited 15×
- State v. LeonardOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 9×
- State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.