State v. Roberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, under the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine, courts may choose to resolve an otherwise moot issue when “the issue is one of public interest which is capable of repetition and may repeatedly circumvent review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Y.J. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-03-03· cited 13×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-11-24· cited 11×
• J.K. v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2020-07-17· cited 3×
• Sproates v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2003-12-12· cited 1×
• YJ v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-03-03
• Adam Phillip Ives v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-03-31
• Alaska Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-05-19
• James Buster Bowen v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-06-30
• Adam Phillip Ives v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-10-13

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Trustees for Alaska v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-05-01· cited 80×
• Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-08-11· cited 53×
• Progressive Insurance Co. v. Simmons
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-02-20· cited 44×
• Sonneman v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 26×
• State v. Patterson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-07-31· cited 25×
• Perry v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1967-06-19· cited 19×
• State v. McCallion
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1994-06-03· cited 12×
• Municipality of Anchorage v. Baxley
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1997-11-19· cited 11×
• Krohn v. State, Department of Fish & Game
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1997-05-30· cited 8×
• Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. Rosier
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-02-24· cited 7×