Skip to main content
· 5/30/1997

Krohn v. State, Department of Fish & Game

Citations

  • 938 P.2d 1019
  • 1997 Alas. LEXIS 74
  • 1997 WL 282932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issue was moot because Department of Fish and Game repealed challenged regulations
  • holding that issue was moot because Department of Fish and Game repealed challenged regulations
  • refusing to decide moot issues under provisions of Open Meetings Act that were subsequently amended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.