Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/15/1991

State v. Carlson

Citations

812 P.2d 536
61 Wash. App. 865
1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding it is a “rule that, when a ruling on a motion in limine is tentative, any error in admitting or excluding evidence is waived”
finding no abuse of discretion when trial court found three-and-one-half year old sexual abuse victim competent to testify
“Carlson never sought a final decision. He therefore waived any error in excluding that evidence”
juror's failure to reveal her knowledge of the subject of sexual abuse at voir dire did not warrant a new trial for a rape defendant because such knowledge would not have supported a challenge for cause
“when a ruling on a motion in limine is tentative, any error in admitting or excluding evidence is waived unless the trial court is given an opportunity to reconsider its ruling”
inconsistencies in a child's testimony go to weight and credibility, not competency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.