Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/22/2006

State v. Riofta

Citations

134 Wash. App. 669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

PRPs “must raise new points of fact and law that were not or could not have been raised” previously
“or” is disjunctive unless there is clear legislative intent to the contrary
\We presume that the word 'or' does not mean 'and' and that a statute's use of the word 'or' is disjunctive to separate phrases unless there is a clear legislative intent to the contrary.\
\or\ is disjunctive unless there is clear legislative intent to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Deren, Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.