Osborne v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that further DNA testing “would not conclusively establish Osborne’s innocence,” based in part on the reasoning that the blue condom “might have been coincidentally left in the vicinity by another person before the police arrived”
• asserting that the State should be allowed to counter a post-conviction innocence claim with evidence of the defendant’s confession to the Parole Board
• holding Osborne was unable to meet this three-part test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
  Supreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 782×
• Cunningham v. District Attorney's Office for Escambia County
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-01-06· cited 178×
• Osborne v. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-04-02· cited 48×
• Lindeman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2011-01-07· cited 6×
• Lambert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2018-11-16· cited 3×
• Osborne v. District Attorneys Office for the Third Judicial District
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-04-01
• Gregory Marino v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2025-08-22

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re the Personal Restraint Gentry
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-02-18· cited 161×
• Dorman v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-01-23· cited 135×
• Grinols v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-10-13· cited 46×
• Salinas v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1962-06-30· cited 45×
• Merrill v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1969-07-21· cited 36×
• Rodgers v. Ray
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-07-03· cited 33×
• Riofta v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-22· cited 22×
• State v. Riofta
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-22· cited 22×
• Owens v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 19×