Skip to main content
· 3/10/1994

Dyer v. R. E. Christiansen Trucking, Inc.

Citations

  • 868 P.2d 1325
  • 318 Or. 391
  • 1994 Ore. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing trial court’s authority to determine the relevancy, under OEC 401, and admissibility, under OEC 402, of a videotape purporting to depict circumstances similar to those giving rise to the plaintiffs injury
  • correspondence with expert before he was asked to testify is privileged under OEC 503(2)(b)
  • correspondence with expert before he was asked to testify is privileged under OEC 503(2)(b)
  • examining expert’s qualification to testify about point of impact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.