Arizona Supreme Court· 1/21/1997

State v. Richcreek

Citations

930 P.2d 1304
187 Ariz. 501
234 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 22
1997 Ariz. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

emphasizing police officers may not use any available means to satisfy themselves about innocence of unusual activity
emphasizing police officers may not use any available means to satisfy themselves about innocence of unusual activity
emphasizing police officers may not use any available means to satisfy themselves about innocence of unusual activity
disapproving prior jurisprudence which had stated that police officers who confront “ ‘strange or unusual activities ... should satisfy [themselves] as to the innocence of the activity by all reasonable, lawful means’ ”
disapproving prior jurisprudence which had stated that police officers who confront “‘strange or unusual activities . . . should satisfy [themselves] as to the innocence of the activity by all reasonable, lawful means’”
disapproving prior jurisprudence which had stated that police officers who confront “‘strange or unusual activities . . . should satisfy [themselves] as to the innocence of the activity by all reasonable, lawful means’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Zlaket, Jones, Moeller, Martone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.