· 3/25/2008
State v. Fornof
Citations
- 179 P.3d 954
- 218 Ariz. 74
- 526 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 2008 Ariz. App. LEXIS 50
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no error in the admission of expert testimony that the amount and value of cocaine possessed by the defendant indicated it was for sale rather than personal use
- trial court properly “permit[ed] an expert to testify that he believed the quantity of drugs [the defendant] had possessed were for sale, rather than personal use”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vãsquez Vásquez, Eckerstrom, Espinosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.