Skip to main content
· 9/19/2002

Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department

Citations

  • 54 P.3d 355
  • 203 Ariz. 326
  • 382 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6
  • 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the predicate stop giving 10 rise to a DWI investigation must be lawful
  • holding that “the exclusionary rule, although required to preserve and protect Fourth Amendment rights in the criminal context, should not be applied to civil license suspension hearings____”
  • holding exclusionary rule does not apply to administrative license suspension proceeding
  • sanction of license suspension for refusal to submit to test intended to quickly revoke licenses of dangerous drivers
  • the validity of an investigatory stop is not an issue to be considered in a driver’s license suspension case
  • courts may “judicially engraft” a requirement into a statute “only if the C onstitution compels” it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Espinosa, Druke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.