Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 10/5/1993
In Re Rodriguez
Citations
- 506 N.W.2d 660
- 1993 Minn. App. LEXIS 976
- 1993 WL 387908
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying clearly erroneous standard to finding that appellant had psychopathic personality
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker, Huspeni, Davies
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-01-14· cited 97×
- In Re IrwinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-21· cited 23×
- In Re BieganowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-23· cited 17×
- American States Insurance v. Mankato Iron & Metal, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1993-11-30· cited 10×
- Matter of SchweningerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-16· cited 4×
- State v. WarrenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-06-24· cited 4×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court· 1940-02-26· cited 314×
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-06-01· cited 47×
- In Re the Alleged Psychopathic Personality of JoelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-18· cited 33×
- Matter of JostSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-01-09· cited 12×
- In Re BlodgettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-11-03· cited 11×
- In Re the Alleged Psychopathic Personality of JoelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-03-02· cited 9×
- Marriage of Hofseth v. HofsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-05-22· cited 9×
- Matter of BuckhaltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-09-10· cited 8×
- Matter of ClementsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-05-23· cited 8×
- In Re StilinovichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-01-14· cited 7×
- Matter of TerraCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-09-22· cited 7×
- Matter of JostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-06-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.