Skip to main content

State v. Rich

Citations

  • 180 P.3d 744
  • 218 Or. App. 642
  • 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ORS 166.025(1)(b) is “a classic time, place, or manner law,” and that, “[i]f the regulated noise happens to be speech, then enforcement is unconstitutional only if the enforcement is directed toward the speech’s content and not its noncom-municative elements”
  • interpreting the term “unreasonable noise” in ORS 166.025(l)(b), “insofar as it might refer to noise caused by speech, to refer only to its noncom-municative elements,” such as its “volume, duration, etc.”
  • disorderly con- duct statute was applied against the defendant because of the noncommunicative elements of his speech and was not unconstitutional as applied to him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Ortega, Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.