Skip to main content

State v. Rich

Citations

  • 3 A.3d 1210
  • 415 Md. 567
  • 2010 Md. LEXIS 375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between forfeited rights, which are reviewable for plain error, and waived rights, which cannot be reviewed on appeal
  • addressing the distinction between “forfeited rights” which “are reviewable for plain error,” and “waived rights,” which ordinarily “are not”
  • in turn quoting United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993)
  • The “rules for preservation of issues have a salutary purpose of preventing unfairness and requiring that all issues be raised in and decided by the trial court, and these rules must be followed in all cases.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.